I would like to help today and donate

Next
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Next
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
CLOSE

The Netherlands: Gamal (not his real name)

CASE STUDY

The Netherlands: Gamal (not his real name)

admin - December 18, 2019 - violence in detention

 

Upon his arrival in Schiphol airport as an asylum seeker, Gamal was told he was going to be taken somewhere with a bed and food. He wasn’t told it was a detention centre.

He was taken to the detention centre at Shiphol, where he was asked to strip naked, prior to be given his clothes back. He was not informed about the house rules or his rights by the detention staff, including his right to file complaints. He found out about it by asking other detainees.

While in detention Gamal was punched by one of the guards. Fortunately, the incident was witnessed by another detainee, who was able to raise the alarm. They were separated by other prison guards. As a result, the victim was confined to his cell for one day by the prison director, who simply didn’t believe him, nor his claim that he was being ‘treated as a dog’ by the guard.

The director told the victim that she would apologise only if the camera footage showed he did not try to block his cell door, which was apparently enough to cause the guard to retaliate. The director did not want to take any statements from witnesses.  The victim filed a complaint, but it was rejected because there wasn’t any video evidence.

This incident was part of a pattern of behaviour experienced by the victim. On another occasion, the victim was threatened by a prison guard in the corridors. He went to the border police to complain about this. On this occasion, the police referred the complaint to the public prosecutor.

Unfortunately, the camera footage was not sufficient to prove the words said to the victim by the guard.

The case again illustrates the problems with regards to evidence and the power imbalance that exists between detainees and staff in migration detention contexts. The victim only found about his rights out by chance, without which he might not even have known how to make complaints about his treatment.

If you are a journalist interested in this story, please call the media team on +44 (0) 7749 785 932 or email [email protected]

Keep up to date

Receive updates on our work and news about Fair Trials globally

Activities in the following sections on this website are supported by the Justice Programme of the European Union: Legal Experts Advisory Panel, Defence Rights Map, Case Law Database, Advice Guides and Latest News. More information about our financial supporters is available here.