The Disappearing Trial

The trial is the archetype of criminal justice, but is starting to disappear. In many parts of the world, trials are being replaced by legal regimes that encourage suspects to admit guilt and waive their right to a full trial.

What is the Problem?

We have coordinated research across 90 countries leading to the publication of our report, The Disappearing Trial: Towards a rights-based approach to trial waiver systems. This report (published on 27th April) presents the results of that research, analysing the drivers of this phenomenon, assessing the legal and human rights implications and providing recommendations for the development of a rights-based approach to trial waiver systems. This is just a starting point, and we are working to:

Raise awareness of trial waivers as a crucial human rights and rule of law issue because the trial itself is no longer the guarantee of fairness in criminal justice systems;
Encourage human rights bodies (and those advancing trial waiver practices globally) to recognise the need to develop globally accepted standards; and
To support local experts to ensure that countries implementing trial waiver systems (or reviewing existing ones) take account of the wealth of experience globally on the risks and opportunities created by trial waivers.

A summary of the report is available here.

Key Stats

300%

The increase in the global use of trial waiver systems

97%

Percentage of convictions resulting from pleas in the US

20,000

Number of people estimated to be in prison in the US who are factually innocent

17

Number of years Rodney Roberts spent in prison

Page

Social Media – How to stay in touch with us

What do we want?

Fair Trials recognises the benefits of trial waiver systems. However, we also recognise that, if they aren’t accompanied by safeguards, they can cause major problems to justice and the rule of law. We believe that trial waiver systems should be rooted in a rights-based approach. This can include:

mandatory access to a lawyer,
sufficient time and information to understand the case against you,
judicial scrutiny of evidence and procedure,
involvement of a judge in negotiations, enhanced recording/data collection and
limitations on benefits so that the incentives to plead don’t become so extreme that they produce perverse outcomes, with innocent people pleading guilty.

CASE STUDY

Flavia Totoro

Page

A visual breakdown of plea bargaining

CASE STUDY

Rodney Roberts

What are we doing?

The trial is the archetype of criminal justice: just think of the dominance of court-room drama in film, TV and literature. But, in reality, the trial is starting to disappear. People are increasingly being incentivised to simply plead guilty and to waive their right to a trial.

The use of trial waiver systems like plea bargaining, abbreviated trials and cooperating witness procedures have increased about 300% since 1990. It’s also happening in more places than ever before. Of the 90 countries studied by Fair Trials and Freshfields, 66 now have these kinds of formal “trial waiver” systems in place. In 1990, the number was just 19.

We are not opposed to this in principle but these out-of-court mechanisms can impact fair trial rights and the criminal justice system more widely in serious ways, including:

Innocent people can be persuaded to plead guilty: an estimated 20,000 innocent people are in US prisons alone, after taking a deal.
Easier convictions can encourage over-criminalisation and drive harsher sentences.
Inequality of arms and a lack of transparency where “deals” are done by prosecutors behind closed doors.
Public trust in justice can be undermined.

Publication

I would like to help today and donate