Defending theHuman Rightto a Fair Trial
June 22, 2016
Stephen Mason is a barrister specialising in the role of electronic evidence. Here, he explains an initiative that he has created centred around the idea of a convention on electronic evidence.
The Draft Convention is the first treaty on electronic evidence, dealing with the status of electronic evidence; the investigation and examination of electronic evidence, and general provisions regarding the recognition and admissibility of electronic evidence from foreign jurisdictions.
The main objective of the draft Convention on Electronic Evidence is to pursue a common policy towards electronic evidence, taking into account the differences in the treatment of evidence in individual jurisdictions.
The aim is to encourage judges and lawyers to more fully understand the concept of electronic evidence in the interests of providing for fairness in legal proceedings; to promote adequate legal procedures, to implement appropriate legislation where necessary and to promote international co-operation.
The idea of a Convention on Electronic Evidence:
I have undertaken a great deal of training of judges and lawyers in electronic evidence across the world, especially with the Academy of European Law. More recently, participants have asked if the United Nations or the Council of Europe were considering a Convention on Electronic Evidence.
I do not think either body are considering such a Convention, so I concluded that it might be useful to develop such a Convention with the help of judges and lawyers across the world. I appreciate this is a private initiative, but sometimes private initiatives help.
The aim is to help judges and lawyers to more fully understand the topic. I have two books on the topic, but they are not widely read, although I have plans to put Electronic Evidence online for free for the 4th edition.
The difference a Convention could make:
We have to think about electronic evidence in a different way to paper and other more familiar forms of evidence. In particular, we have to think about the authentication of electronic evidence and the need to encourage governments to permit the faster movement of evidence across jurisdictional boundaries.
We live in a networked world, and it is important for judges and lawyers to understand the importance of the topic.
In the criminal context, Mutual Legal Assistance can be slow, and prosecuting authorities sometimes give up with a prosecution because the evidence is not forthcoming from the requested state. Such a Convention might encourage a positive change.
If any readers have experience of dealing with trials in jurisdictions from across the world, and are willing to illustrate the practical problems and offer some solutions, that will be very helpful.
Your opinion on this draft convention would be very valuable and I encourage everyone, scholars, judges, lawyers and digital evidence specialists to take part and comment to help refine the draft convention into its final form.
To take part in the consultation you can register here, or you can e-mail your comments [email protected]
The consultation closes on the 30th September 2016. The final version will be published in the Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review in the autumn of 2016.
This is a guest post written by Stephen Mason and may not reflect the views of Fair Trials. Stephen Mason is a barrister and a recognised authority on electronic signatures and digital evidence.
If you are a journalist interested in this story, please telephone Fair Trials’ press department on +44 (0) 20 7822 2370 or +44 (0) 7950 849 851.
For regular updates follow Fair Trials on Twitter or sign up to our monthly bulletin at the bottom of the page.
Show your support and Link to us.
View our Site Map
By accessing, browsing or otherwise using this website
Fair Trials Europe is a registered public foundation in Belgium (No. 552688677).
Fair Trials Europe was founded by Fair Trials International
(a registered charity with limited liability in England and Wales, Nos 1134586 and 7135273),
together they form Fair Trials.