I would like to help today and donate

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.


INTERPOL plays a vital role in fighting crime, but its systems are being abused by countries around the world in order to persecute refugees, journalists and peaceful political demonstrators.

Photo: interpol.int

What is the Problem?

INTERPOL, the world’s largest international policing organisation, plays a vital role in fighting crime, connecting police forces across the globe to facilitate the arrest and extradition of people wanted for serious crimes. However, its systems - particularly its international ‘wanted person’ alerts (Red Notices) are being abused by countries around the world to persecute refugees, journalists and peaceful political demonstrators, at huge personal cost to these individuals. We are especially concerned about the operation of the CCF, INTERPOL’s existing supervisory authority, which is the only realistic option for people subject to an INTERPOL alert to seek a remedy.

Some changes have been introduced, but there is more work to be done.



What do we want?

Fair Trials is campaigning for simple changes to help make INTERPOL a more effective crime-fighting tool. We believe that INTERPOL can and must do better at filtering out abuses of its systems before information is sent out to police forces across the globe. When abusive ‘wanted person’ alerts do slip through the net, victims should have redress through an open and impartial process.


What are we doing?

Since 2012, Fair Trials has played a leading role in highlighting the misuse of INTERPOL and contributed to the reform process. We have:

  • Helped dozens of people who have been subject to abusive INTERPOL alerts from countries including Russia, Belarus, Turkey, Venezuela, Sri Lanka and Indonesia.
  • Worked constructively with INTERPOL to understand the cause of the problems and develop realistic reform proposals set out in our report, ‘Strengthening respect for human rights, strengthening INTERPOL'.
  • Organised events to raise awareness of the problem amongst policymakers including in Washington D.C. (in partnership with Georgetown Law),  the Parliamentary Assembly for the Council of Europe,  European Parliament and the Oslo Freedom Forum.
  • Highlighted shocking cases of injustice, generating press coverage around the world (our short films provide an illustration of the devastating impact that these alerts can have on those affected).
  • Held a positive meeting with Secretary General Jürgen Stock to discuss reforming the way the Red Notice system is operated.


Key Stats


Number of Red Notices issued in 2000


Number of Red Notices issued in 2020


How many years Dolkun Isa had a Red Notice before it was deleted


The number of years Sayed Abdellatif has been held in detention, because of an abusive Red Notice

Sayed Abdellatif


Dolkun Isa


Our work has not gone unnoticed.

In March 2017, INTERPOL introduced a several reforms, which were informed by our recommendations, and they include:

  • Greater independence and influence of The Commission for the Control of INTERPOL's Files (CCF);
  • Improvements to the CCF’s capacity and expertise;
  • Better transparency and respect for the equality of arms; and
  • Reasoned and public decisions on individual cases

The political pressure mounted for INTERPOL to introduce these changes, including from the OSCE, a US Senate Committee and the Council of Europe.

These reforms followed earlier changes introduced in 2015, when, following a meeting with Fair Trials, INTERPOL announced that it had taken the first steps towards implementing reforms that we had proposed, including the introduction of a new refugee policy.

As well as an announcement of new safeguards against abuse of INTERPOL, based on our recommendations, we have continued to have successes elsewhere.

Our achievements include:

  • The removal of global wanted person alerts, including in the cases of Paramjeet Singh, and Bahar Kimyongür, whose Red Notice was finally deleted this summer after repeated requests from Fair Trials
  • Constructive dialogue with INTERPOL, which has resulted in INTERPOL setting up a ‘working group‘ to review its operations as well as proposed reforms of the Red Notice system, a development Fair Trials has welcomed
  • Building political support for reform of INTERPOL, including in the EU institutions, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe and the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe
Key Stats


Number of Red Notices issued in 2000


Number of Red Notices issued in 2020


How many years Dolkun Isa had a Red Notice before it was deleted


The number of years Sayed Abdellatif has been held in detention, because of an abusive Red Notice

Vicdan Özerdem

Frequently Asked Questions


INTERPOL is an organisation based in Lyon, France, which facilitates cooperation between national police forces. With over 190 member countries (almost every country in the world), it is by far the largest international police organisation. INTERPOL was not created by an international treaty and its constitution was not submitted to governments for ratification. Instead, it relies on the voluntary participation (and financial support) of its members, through their own police forces. 

INTERPOL consists of:

  • The General Assembly, its main decision-making and legislative body, which is composed of all the national delegations of the member countries
  • The Executive Committee, consisting of 13 delegates elected by the General Assembly
  • The General Secretariat, a permanent administrative body implementing the decisions of the General Assembly and Executive Committee
  • The Secretary General, currently Jürgen Stock, whose appointment is proposed by the Executive Committee and approved by the General Assembly
  • The Commission for the Control of Interpol’s Files (CCF), which has the task of ensuring processing of data complies with INTERPOL’s rules

Though not actually part of INTERPOL, the other key actor in the Interpol structure is the ‘National Central Bureau’ of each member country.

What is a National Central Bureau?

A National Central Bureau (NCB) is the law enforcement agency in each country with responsibility for communicating with Interpol and other NCBs. Typically, this will be a division of the national police force, often the one dealing with serious crime and/or cross-border cooperation.

How is INTERPOL funded?

INTERPOL has a budget of around €139 million per year, of which €59 million comes from member countries. Out of member countries, the United States makes the largest contribution to INTERPOL, around €11 million, followed by Japan, Germany, France, and the United Kingdom.

The rest of INTERPOL’s income comes from voluntary funding, through various partnerships with both public and private bodies. Often, funding is tied to specific projects. In recent years, INTERPOL have partnered with FIFA, Philip Morris, the International Olympic Committee for various projects, and it has received significant funding from the European Commission and the US Department of State. The INTERPOL Foundation for a Safer World, a non-profit organisation headquartered in Geneva, is also a major funder.

What powers does INTERPOL have?

INTERPOL is not a police force. It has no powers to arrest anyone, investigate or prosecute crimes, but it occasionally deploys ‘Incident Response Teams’ to assist national police forces during joint cross-border operations or large-scale public events.

INTERPOL’s primary role is to facilitate information-exchange between national police forces. It maintains several databases containing, for example, information on lost and stolen travel documents, firearms, stolen works of art, stolen vehicles and stolen administrative documents. Its databases also include nominal data on known offenders, missing persons and dead bodies, including photographs and fingerprints. INTERPOL’s databases for all these purposes are connected to the NCBs by means of the secure global network called ‘I-24/7’.

What is a Red Notice?

INTERPOL is best known for issuing ‘Red Notices’. A Red Notice is an alert requested by a member country or another authorised entity indicating that it seeks an individual’s arrest, detention or restriction of movement for the purposes of extradition, surrender or similar lawful action.

A Red Notice is circulated to all member countries by INTERPOL at the request of an NCB. Member countries are under no international legal obligation to act on a Red Notice, but there are countries that automatically arrest anyone who is subject to a Red Notice.

Requests for Red Notices are reviewed by a ‘task force’ at INTERPOL to ensure they comply with INTERPOL’s rules, before they are approved and circulated.

What happens if someone is subject to a Red Notice?

A person subject to a Red Notice is vulnerable to arrest by any INTERPOL member country. In some countries, they risk being automatically arrested and subjected to extradition proceedings. Even if they are not eventually extradited, they could spend a long time in detention, sometimes in very poor conditions.

Even if the person is not arrested in one country, they will often be forced to avoid travelling across international borders for fear of arrest at airports or land and sea border points. This can separate people from their families, ruin their business activities and turn them into exiles.

A Red Notice can have other consequences too: bank accounts may be frozen or closed, mortgages can be refused, professional licenses can be denied, visa applications turned down, and people can find it impossible to obtain or keep employment. If a red notice becomes publicly known, it can also damage the person’s reputation, branding them an international criminal.

What is a diffusion?

Member countries often send less formal requests for police cooperation through INTERPOL’s channels. These are similar to emails, and our understanding is that they are checked by INTERPOL after they have been sent. If INTERPOL agrees that the request was made in compliance with its rules, it validates the request as a ‘diffusion’.

Diffusions can make the same request as Red Notices – to request the arrest of a wanted person. Although intended to be less formal than Red Notices, diffusions often have the same effect as Red Notices on the individuals. An NCB might decide to use a diffusion instead of a Red Notice if, for example it wants to limit the request to specific NCBs, or if it wants to seek a person’s arrest where the specific conditions for a Red Notice (e.g., the minimum sentence threshold) are not met.

Can Red Notices and diffusions be misused?

Red Notices and diffusions are important tools for cross-border police cooperation that enable police forces to track down and seek the extradition of fugitives. However, they are also used by certain countries to harass, intimidate, and discredit their critics and opponents, some of whom would face severe human rights abuses if extradited.

Under INTERPOL’s own constitution, it is strictly forbidden for the organisation to undertake any intervention or activities of a political, military, religious or racial character, and its activities need to comply with international human rights standards. However, INTERPOL has not always been able to enforce these rules effectively, because of the lack of effective mechanisms to check and review Red Notice requests and diffusions.

INTERPOL has recognised that Red Notices and diffusions can be misused, and in recent years, it has introduced significant reforms to strengthen its internal vetting procedures for red notices and diffusions. These improvements have not halted the misuse of Red Notices and diffusions, and Fair Trials has continued to see cases of political activists and human rights campaigners being unjustly targeted.

Can Red Notices and diffusions be used against refugees?

INTERPOL has a policy that states that Red Notices and diffusions against recognised refugees and asylum seekers are not permitted. The precise text of this policy cannot be found on any of INTERPOL’s official documents that are publicly accessible, but it has been published by Fair Trials. 

How do people find out if they are subject to a Red Notice or a diffusion?

INTERPOL frequently uploads the details of individuals subject to Red Notices on its website, but this only represents a small minority of over 60,000 people who have Red Notices against them.

Individuals can make a request to the CCF to find out if they are subject to a Red Notice, diffusion, or any other information being held on INTERPOL’s systems. However, the CCF does not typically disclose any information to individuals unless it has the permission of the country responsible for issuing the Red Notice or diffusion.

Can Red Notices and diffusions be challenged?

Most individuals challenge Red Notices or diffusions either by requesting the issuing country to delete them, or by filing a complaint with the CCF. The CCF has been subject to severe criticism for being an inefficient and ineffective redress mechanism. In the past, it was not uncommon for individuals to have to wait for several years for the CCF to handle their complaint, and if they received a decision, they were non-binding and they contained no reasoning. Reforms to the CCF introduced since 2018 have resulted in many improvements, but challenges remain regarding the transparency of its procedures, and the inability to challenge the CCF’s decisions.

See the pdf version.

Keep up to date

Receive updates on our work and news about Fair Trials globally

Some activities in the following sections on this website are funded by the European Union’s Justice Programme (2014-2020): Legal Experts Advisory Panel, Defence Rights Map, Case Law Database, Advice Guides, Resources, Campaigns, Publications, News and Events. This content represents the views of the authors only and is their sole responsibility. It cannot be considered to reflect the views of the European Commission or any other body of the European Union. The European Commission does not accept any responsibility for use that may be made of the information it contains.