I would like to help today and donate

Next
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Next
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
CLOSE
NEWS

Jail or bail? We can learn from the USA

admin - April 24, 2019 - Pre-trial detention

 

On 2 April, Fair Trials and Harvard Law School’s Criminal Justice Policy Program organised an event that brought together key criminal justice reformers from the USA and Europe. Penelope Gibbs from Transform Justice, a charity in the UK, travelled to Boston to speak at the event and wrote about the discussion. This post is an abridged version of the one published on Transform Justice’s website. As with all our guest posts, the views represented are of the author and may not reflect the views of Fair Trials.

The US bail system is very odd. For at least 50 years they have avoided the issue of who should or should not get bail by making people offer a huge amount of money to get out of jail pre-trial – having to offer a bail bond (“surety”) of $50,000 is not uncommon. If the defendant does not turn up for their court appearance, the money is forfeited. A bail bond industry has developed, which underwrites bail bonds for those willing and able to pay 10% of the value. So, rich people pay the whole amount, those on middling incomes pay bail bond companies, and poor people languish in jail because they and their families cannot afford to pay at all.

It’s easy to knock the US for their eccentric bail bond system, but they also host some really exciting developments. New York State has just radically reformed its bail legislation, to make it much more difficult to remand defendants. They have passed legislation to eliminate money bail almost completely. Now most defendants must either be detained pre-trial, or released on conditional/unconditional bail. This legislative reform is radical – part of the project to reduce mass incarceration in New York State. There are also innovative projects springing up all over the USA.

We were all particularly inspired by the De Bug “court doing” (as oppose to “court watching” or observing) project which is based in Silicon Valley but could work anywhere. This comes out of the community organising movement and harnesses community resources to help those in trouble with the law.  A key reason people are denied their freedom as they wait for their trial is that they are suspected of absconding or not turning up at court. Those who face serious charges, who are “homeless” and those who have a record of not turning up for court appearances are all seen as high risk. The De Bug project (a community organisation funded from private donations) helps defendants get bail at their first appearance, or to get bailed having been remanded, by providing evidence that the defendant has community ties and supporters.

De Bug helps the defence lawyer liaise with and get information from the family. They have a team stationed in criminal courts waiting to help. A De Bug worker sits down with the family to gather all the information which might help get their “loved one” bail (preferably not secured by money). They ask about where the defendant lives and could stay, about their work, and about who could give them a lift to court. This information is entered into a form for the Public Defender to use in putting the case for bail. This is a goldmine for the defence – information to back up how that individual could be supported in the community as they await trial. This intensely personal information disrupts the court conveyor belt and makes it much harder for the judge to justify pre-trial detention.

The project is very successful – the pre-trial remand rate is nearly halved in those courts where De Bug is working. The power of De Bug is that it enables the families of defendants to help their loved ones. So often in England and Wales the family feels powerless and passive as the system processes their nearest and dearest and makes decisions on remand that harm the whole family.

The only challenge with using the De Bug model elsewhere is that it is clearly resource intensive – you need a team in court every day. But through reducing remand, the state saves considerable imprisonment costs. And more importantly, those who have not been convicted are allowed to be free to work and contribute to society.

I left Boston enthused by the passion of colleagues to reduce remand but musing on how to ignite that same passion in England and Wales. Prison is a dead end, but few are aware that we are sending so many people who have not been convicted straight into that dead end.

If you are a journalist interested in this story, please telephone Fair Trials’ press department on +44 (0) 20 7822 2370 or +32 (0) 2 360 04 71.

Keep up to date

Receive updates on our work and news about Fair Trials globally

Activities in the following sections on this website are supported by the Justice Programme of the European Union: Legal Experts Advisory Panel, Defence Rights Map, Case Law Database, Advice Guides and Latest News. More information about our financial supporters is available here.