The ECtHR found a violation of Article 6 (1) and 3 (c) of the Convention when the domestic courts relied on the witness testimonies recounting a confession made by the applicant to secure his conviction. According to the applicant the confession had been extracted in the absence of a lawyer after the two officers had beaten him. The applicant had been arrested and placed in police custody on the suspicion that he had committed an offence of murder. Whilst in police custody, the applicant had been informally questioned by two officers during which he aparently confessed to having also committed a theft. On the next day he was formally charged with other offence, whilst charges in relation to the murder and the theft at issue were only formally brought against him 6 months later.
In this case, the ECtHR build on its previous judgements in Ibrahim and Others and Simeonovi in which the Court set up a two-stages test in order to decide whether a failure to grant access to a lawyer would amount to a violation of Article 6: whether there were compelling reasons to restrict the right and whether the fairness of the proceedings have been affected overall. First, the ECtHR found that under Bulgarian law, there had been no “compelling reasons” to restrict the right of the applicant to access a lawyer. Secondly, the ECtHR stated that in the absence of “compelling reasons” for restricting the right to legal assistance, the ECtHR must apply a very strict scrutiny to its fairness assessment. It expressly stated that ‘in cases such as the present one, where there have been no “compelling reasons” to restrict access to a lawyer at the early stages of the proceedings, it can only exceptionally find that the overall fairness of proceedings has not been prejudiced by that initial failure to observe the accused’s rights’. In Ibrahim and Others the ECtHR set out non-exhaustive list of factors to be taken into account in order to assess the impact of procedural failings at the pre-trial stage on the overall fairness of the criminal proceedings:
You can read the full judgment here.
If you are a journalist interested in this story, please call the media team on +44 (0) 7749 785 932 or email [email protected]