I would like to help today and donate

Next
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Next
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
CLOSE
Case law

CJEU, Case C-278/16 Sleutjes

October 2017 - Germany

On 12 October 2017, the Court of Justice interpreted the concept of “essential document” in Article 3 of Directive 2010/64, pursuant to which Member States are required to ensure that suspects or accused persons who do not understand the language of the criminal proceedings are, within a reasonable period of time, provided with a written translation of all the documents which are essential to ensure the exercise of their rights of defence and to safeguard the fairness of the proceedings. By way of background, a penalty order was issued against Mr Sleutjes, a Dutch citizen who did not understand German, imposing a fine for failure to stop at the scene of an accident. The penalty order, which was in German, included only a partial Dutch translation on legal remedies, and specified that the order would become legally binding and enforceable unless Mr Sleutjes lodged an objection, in German, within two weeks of notification. Mr Sleutjes proceeded to lodge an objection, but it was dismissed on the grounds that it was not filed in time. The referring court asked the Court whether a penalty order, which was issued by a judge following a simplified unilateral procedure, constitutes an “essential document” which must be translated for suspects or accused persons who do not understand the language of the proceedings in question. The Court confirmed that the penalty order constituted a “document which is essential”, within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2010/64, and therefore a written translation has to be provided to suspects or accused persons who do not understand the language of the proceedings, in order to enable that person effectively to exercise his rights of defence.

You can read the full judgment here.

If you are a journalist interested in this story, please call the media team on +44 (0) 7749 785 932 or email [email protected]

Keep up to date

Receive updates on our work and news about Fair Trials globally

Some activities in the following sections on this website are funded by the European Union’s Justice Programme (2014-2020): Legal Experts Advisory Panel, Defence Rights Map, Case Law Database, Advice Guides, Resources, Campaigns, Publications, News and Events. This content represents the views of the authors only and is their sole responsibility. It cannot be considered to reflect the views of the European Commission or any other body of the European Union. The European Commission does not accept any responsibility for use that may be made of the information it contains.